📔
Aude Product Documentation
  • Welcome to Aude
    • Why Continuous Performance Management?
  • Goals
    • Introduction
    • Personal Development Goals
    • Performance Categories
      • Microsoft's Growth Mindset Principles
      • Google's Ten things we know to be true
      • Amazon's Leadership Principles
      • Engineering Excellence
    • Defining Effective Goals and Criteria
  • Managing Aude
    • User Management
      • Managing Users
      • User Roles
    • Team Management
      • Creating and Managing Teams
    • Managing Data Sources
      • Data Sources & Integration Setup
      • Issue Tracking
        • Jira
      • Source Control
        • Github
      • Knowledge Management
        • Confluence
      • Messaging
        • Slack
          • Managing the Aude for Slack App
  • Onboarding
    • Building Better Engineering Teams Together
    • Getting Started with Aude
      • Connecting Your Engineering Tools
      • Connecting GitHub
      • Connecting Slack
      • Connecting Jira and Confluence
      • Define Your Leadership Principles
      • Invite Users
      • Setting Up Your Teams
      • Calibrating Your Performance Insights
      • Connecting GitLab (Installation Guide)
  • Information Security
    • Aude Data Retention Policy
    • Aude Service Level Agreement
    • Aude Data Portability Policy
    • Aude Data Protection Policy
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Moving Beyond Annual Reviews
  • The Old Way: Annual Reviews
  • Subjective and Biased
  • Delayed Feedback
  • Disconnected from Daily Work
  • The Better Way: Continuous Management
  • Real-Time Insights
  • Data-Driven Decisions
  • Strategic Alignment
  • Making the Transition
  1. Welcome to Aude

Why Continuous Performance Management?

PreviousWelcome to AudeNextIntroduction

Last updated 6 months ago

Moving Beyond Annual Reviews

Traditional performance management is broken. Annual or quarterly reviews create a cycle of delayed feedback, missed opportunities, and frustrating conversations, leaving managers and engineers feeling underserved. Modern engineering teams need a more dynamic, data-driven approach that reflects how software is actually built.

The Old Way: Annual Reviews

Traditional performance management suffers from several key problems:

Subjective and Biased

  • Relies heavily on manager memory and perception

  • Favors recent achievements over consistent contribution

  • Subject to unconscious biases and personal preferences

Engineering contributions are complex and multifaceted. When reviews happen only once or twice a year, managers can't remember and assess how an engineer has contributed accurately. This leads to recency bias, where recent work overshadows months of consistent performance, and visibility bias, where vocal team members get more recognition than quiet achievers.

Delayed Feedback

  • Issues surface months after they occur

  • Improvement opportunities are missed

  • Career growth stalls waiting for formal reviews

By the time feedback is delivered in an annual review, the moment for meaningful improvement has often passed. Engineers can't adjust their approach or behavior based on input about work from six months ago. This creates frustration on both sides - managers cannot guide their teams effectively, while engineers feel blindsided by feedback that comes too late to act on.

Disconnected from Daily Work

  • Hard to remember accomplishments from months ago

  • Lacks connection to actual engineering activities

  • Missing context about challenges and growth

Annual reviews often fail to capture the reality of engineering work. They miss the daily problem-solving, the mission-critical fixes, the mentoring of colleagues, and the incremental improvements that make great engineers valuable. Without ongoing tracking, these contributions fade from memory or get lost in the noise.

The Better Way: Continuous Management

Aude's approach transforms performance management through:

Real-Time Insights

  • Continuous feedback based on actual work

  • Early detection of both issues and achievements

  • Space to course-correct and improve

Continuous performance management means every pull request, code review, and technical discussion becomes a data point for understanding engineer performance. This creates opportunities for immediate recognition of outstanding work and early intervention when support is needed. Managers can coach in the moment when it matters most.

Data-Driven Decisions

  • Objective measurements from your engineering tools

  • Recognition for all types of contributions

  • Clear evidence of impact and growth

Integrating with your engineering tools, Aude builds a comprehensive picture of how engineers contribute. This includes not just code commits but also technical leadership in reviews, collaboration in discussions, and support of team members. Every engineer's unique value becomes visible through data, eliminating the bias toward the most visible contributors.

Strategic Alignment

  • Connect daily work to organizational goals

  • Track progress against personal development plans

  • Ensure efforts support team and company objectives

Excellent performance management isn't just about tracking what happened - it's about ensuring everyone is moving in the right direction. Continuous feedback helps engineers understand how their daily work connects to larger objectives while giving managers the insights they need to guide their teams toward strategic goals.

Making the Transition

Aude helps organizations move from periodic reviews to continuous performance management by:

  1. Automating data collection from engineering tools

  2. Providing ongoing visibility into performance

  3. Supporting regular feedback conversations

  4. Maintaining history for formal reviews

The shift to continuous performance management doesn't happen overnight, but the benefits are immediate. Engineers get the feedback they need to grow, managers get the insights they need to lead, and organizations build stronger, more engaged engineering teams.